A. IX, R 13 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Under the previous decree, the negligence suit of subordinate government officials was allegedly owned by the plaintiff and On the contrary, in the possession of the provincial government, the provincial government claimed that the suit claiming to own the land was filed by the former provincial government in favor of the plaintiff under O IX, R 13, CPC. Along with the order, the violent nation was also temporarily tried by the trial court, but the appellate court remanded the trial court after the trial court, the order issued by the appellate court. Was presented by the plaintiff. That the government had failed to provide any explanation for the delayed country. The URL did not inform the relevant authorities that the appellate court had earlier disclosed that the previous decision of the case had not been dealt with on the question of limitation, and that the government did not want to appear in court. The explanation was not offered, but the Supreme Court refused to allow the negligence of the subordinate officials to seize public property, which followed the case by the subordinate officials, which shows that they have rightly taken the interest of the government. Could not be viewed and the possibility of joining the league with the claimant could not be ruled out. The technical grounds did not justify the government and preferred that the rights of the parties in the appellate court should be determined on the merit even though the decision was passed without addressing the question of delimitation, This sim
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
