MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus ADDITIONAL DISTRLCT JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the landlord and tenant the tenant's request was that he purchase the disputed property with the landlord attached to the partnership with the husband, for which his case was pending. Is. And that it could not be excluded until such a case was decided, after which the rent controller accepted the eviction request, which was passed by the Appellate Court and the High Court for more than ten years. Was not approved. According to the documents, all utilities holding the disputed property in the Mukmaldal property were in the name of land (electricity, water and other charges) Landy was revealed to be the owner of the department's excise and taxation records, proving himself the exclusive owner of the dispute. Tho property did not find anything illegal in the High Court decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer
