Find a Lawyer

HAJI GHULAM RASUL versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Sections 2 (d), Explan 4, 6 (2) and 7 (1), Proviso West Pakistan Dedicated Properties (Punjab Amendment) Ordinance (XVI of 1971), Sections 2, 3 and 4 liter Patent, 1919, CL 10 LA Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972) Section 3 (2) Interim Constitution of Pakistan (1972), Articles 201 and 281 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Performance of ceremonies on dedicated property (rituals) Implementation of such rights In the terms of the decision passed by the Supreme Court (PLD 1971 SC 376), the chief administrator of the interim dismissed the application, relying on the provisions of Ordinance XVI of 1971, which explicitly overruled the decision. To get the Supreme Wright allowed the appeal so he could consider the letters. Patent Appeals can be rejected by the petitioners, accepting the writ petition filed by the High Court Single Judge and canceling the order of the Chief Administrator of the Apex Court on 28 197 1973, under which they applied some of the application by the applicants. The application filed for was dismissed. The terms of the decision given by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 127 to 167 in Civil Appeal No. 197 (PLD 1971 SC 376), as per the performance of the ceremonies (Rituals) in the court of rights such as Hazrat, Datta Ganj Bakhsh Sahib, Whether a provincial legislature can enforce a law. , Which had the effect of overturning a Supreme Court-approved decision, decree or order, even though amending Ordinance XVI of 1971 was not a valid law. Was Amendment XVI of 1971 amended by Article 281 of the Interim Constitution of 1972 and could not be challenged in a court of law within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the Zia-ur-Rahman case (PLD 1973 SC 49) What is and what modification RD? patent advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer