MST. SHAMIM MAI versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/16 bail, further inquiry The defendant's grant requested that her previous husband divorced her in writing and After the expiry of his term, he legitimately sued. The partner entered into a marriage with the accused, and when her ex-husband refused to claim her as his wife, he brought a lawsuit against her in a marriage lawsuit that was pending before the family court. The question regarding the validity of the marriage contract of the accused was to be determined by the competent family court with the accused. The accused's case had become a matter of further investigation of his crime and was included under section 497 of the CCP (section 2). Attracted to his case, it was alleged that he was formerly found guilty and was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Dadu lawyer