MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE
Definition of Evidence 302/109/34 Evidence The trial court denied the accused's statements to the prosecution witnesses, but essentially sentenced the accused that the evidence of recovery - blood stains - on the accused's offer during the investigation. Ramba submitted that after about three months after the incident, the accused did not release the report of the chemical examiner in this regard after the blood stains on the offensive weapons usually disappeared, usually for such a long time. At the time of the incident, prosecution witnesses said they were shaking the ground and the victim was dead. They were standing on the street and monitoring them, but site investigators, along with the investigating officer, revealed that the incident happened almost in the middle of the field, with eye witnesses in the site's plans. Presence, vibration indicator and no sign of presence. The Tractor Record established that it was neither owned nor possessed by the complainant at the time of the incident on the physical property was silent about the presence of both witnesses in the inquest report prepared by the investigating officer. Whether the incident was in a contradictory account and the Medico legal report regarding the number of individuals injured was sufficient to allay the suspicion of the presence of alleged eyewitnesses at the time of such circumstances. Had already been denied by the co-accused of, they would be of no avail, if any The trial court sentenced the defendant to a conviction if there was no evidence of an independent SIM conflict, they were not stable under the circumstances and were set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer