MUSHTAQ AHMAD ALIAS PAPPU versus THE STATE
Clause 392/411/457 Definition of Evidence Both the complainant and his wife identified the accused in an identity parade, which was locked up in jail and had earlier been charged with the trial court for the acquisition of golden jewelry and homemade jewelry. And he also confirmed it. Complainant and his wife Ocular's account was fully prepared to recover from the accused persons There was no previous background of enmity between the parties. There is no possibility of the accused being lied to. There was no evidence on record that the goat was made. It can be seen that the witnesses had lied against the accused, the prosecution had, without any doubt, proved their case against the accused, there was no reduction in the case and the trial was against the accused. The sentencing sentence was not upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Feroz Walla lawyer
