SHEIKH FAZAL REHMAN & SONS LIMITED versus GHEE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 199 Privatization Commission Ordinance (LII of 2000), Sections 28 and 31 Constitutional Request Pending Constitutional Petition, the competent authority issued the Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 and Sections 28 and 31, which included the matter in the aforementioned constitutional petition. The applicant was of the view that the proceedings could be converted into an application under section 28 of the Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000 as the constitutional petition could be changed and the question of legality could be raised at any stage. There may be appropriate action or some procedure to promote justice. Which was not supplied because there was no express prohibition against converting a constitutional application to an appeal, etc., unless it was expressly prohibited by any provision of law. It was empowered to adopt a procedure in a favorable case in the interest of justice. Techniques were not meant to defeat the end of justice Pet Controversy Iunner was allowed and the constitutional petition was turned into a petition under section 28 of the Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Nilore lawyer