Find a Lawyer

ATTA MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL KARIM

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, (XVII of 1967), Section 45 Suit For Sale Conversion, Interim Order Prohibition, Defendants' Claims for Defendants The trial court's permission to grant the application for separation from the controversial land was granted, but the order on appeal was vacated, arguing that the plaintiff's argument was that the appellate court erred in justifying the improper change. And that the plaintiff was illiterate and the defendant was attacked. There is no doubt that the contents of the unclean variations with respect to the sale were properly stated to the plaintiff before he had made the same justification in the thumb that the plaintiff admitted to the plaintiff that the effect of the invalid change was on the Revenue. The record is given in which the defendant was shown as the owner. And while taking over the disputed land, it was concluded that the plaintiff does not have a case and there is a balance of convenience. The inclination towards this was based on very good reason advocate for immigration from Upper Dir lawyer