Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus MUNSHI KHAN

Failure to deposit Zarib in Section 24 (Pre-Amount) Failure to submit Zar-e-Som in due time The order was passed two days after the trial court instructed the preamble importer to submit the ZAR-E-Som within a month; Dismissed while the umpire filed a review request. The trial court erred in claiming that the time of submission was not yet ended when the trial was dismissed, but the hearing of the petition was dismissed by the trial court, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the trial trial for judgment on the merit. The court remanded. If the Additional Court had failed to comply with the law and related party provisions and failed to comply with the law, Zaraim had to be submitted within thirty days of the filing of the suit. His order was misleading, such party did not face such work or injury, it was not made clear by the trial court's order of the trial court that thirty days from the time of deposit. To submit inside. Instead, the instruction was to submit the goldsmith within a month after which it was to be counted if the trial case was to direct the count of the case from the date of filing of the instruction. Was. The appellate court did not commit any illegal act of accepting the appeal, but it resolved the apparent injustice. The High Court upheld the appellate court top advocate from Dir lawyer