Find a Lawyer

MURTAZA versus THE STATE

Sections 302/324/148/149 The prosecution's case was supported by the complainant's evidence, who was an injured witness, and other prosecution witnesses reaffirmed the allegations in the FIR and Other prosecution witnesses also confirmed her statement. Observing the evacuation and recovery of blood-stained land, the recovery memo caused the suspect to use firearms through medical evidence and the alleged motive complainant was an injured witness and suffered a firearm, himself. It cannot be said that the complainant has presented the exact case of the incident. The prosecution against the accused persons proved the case beyond any reasonable doubt, which was sufficient to prove the evidence on record at the trial. Testimony was sustained, four were reportedly injured, according to firearms and prosecution. Ria is accused of being killed after that, after a series of firearms, her suspects stabbed the injured to death, but the complainant and other witnesses did not identify each of the suspects as dead. The injury was not specifically attributed to a specific suspect. The trial defendant was sentenced to death, as these individuals were reduced to death sentences. online advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer