Find a Lawyer

HAJI ALLAH RAKHA versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Sections 7 (2) (v) (B), (vi), 13 and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and the 1991 Constitution application for violation of the Width of Reduction of the Master Plan of Central Admission Source shops / 70 feet to 30 feet External market access causes problems for the public. The width of the main entry / exit gate was more than 70 feet in the master plan built 40 years ago in 1962, the authority could not show any reasonable reason for reducing the width. The market entry / exit route, which had already received 400 shops authority, while using the discretion to modify its previous scheme, did not meet the needs of modern city planning, such a market Was added to the Authority's Area Controlled Area Duty to ensure its prevention. Increasing chaos in such areas, disruptions and unauthorized construction will reduce the size of such shops, the width of the central entrance / exit gate will not only create huge problems for the masses but will also lead to disappointment. The purposes of the Authority used their discretion to modify such master plan in the manner of the Authority without presenting the market requirements due to the need for expansion of the Road High Court due to the existing market needs. At the request of the Court, the applicants could not sue for the fact that there was a controversial question about the facts. Involved, while such a case can be resolved by taking a look at the master plan and practicing discretion by the authority in the same amendment 40 years later, for such auction buyers to shop. best advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer