Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDULLAH versus THE STATE


Section 497 (2) The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/11/16 bail, was almost six months after the filing of the FIR in the approval of further investigation The accused was charged with a bail plea The certified transcript of the complainant's statement filed by the Additional Sessions Judge is that the complainant himself had satisfied that the accused had not abducted his daughter and the accused was innocent Was. The complainant further stated that he did not want to seek further legal action in this case and had no objection to the accused's bail approval. An individual allegedly recorded the same statement, allegedly an eyewitness. Also made a statement on the statement that he had not seen the incident. Under Section 497 (2), there was a case of further investigation from the accused, the CRPC accused who had been behind bars for the last 9 months, had been admitted to bail for the previous offenders, tances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.