Find a Lawyer

DILAWAR KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 47 F / 7 337 F (i) / evidence 34 Testimonies of evidence Both eyewitnesses were consistently following the prosecution's version, in the case of a major event occurring in the town's market day after day. Could not ignore both the witnesses knew the accused is absolutely fine so there can be no question of wrongful identification even though an injured witness was won and hence he was not produced before the trial court. But he fully supported the prosecution's version during the investigation, there was no material contradiction in that regard. Due to the date, time and place the accused had sufficient cause for the death of the deceased and another witness was also an injured witness of the incident and the presence of two eye witnesses on this occasion was natural as the incident took place in his shop. It just happened outside. The etiquette and style of the testimony were constantly described by the witnesses and they were scrutinized extensively by the defense, but the Defendant M failed to take advantage of such practice, without the witnesses having any The cross-examination failed, as their testimony was not kept saying that witnesses were not mistreated for falsely accusing the accused of fraudulently submitting a death sentence. ? The evidence against the accused and others was anecdotal evidence that the complaining party had not consulted with anyone to create a fictitious story. The presence of a witness to the injured eye at the scene cannot be suspected of any tension in the imagination. The medical evidence background of the animus was available from evidence that it was alleged that he was involved in an e patent advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer