PUNJAB BEVERAGES COMPANY (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER, FAISALABAD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD
Section 62 and 66A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the review of constitutional application was finalized under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 on the basis of the agreement with the Commissioner's approval, on the basis of the audit report There is an error opening the consensus reviews for. The assessee, along with the tax details payable under Section 33 of the Ordinance, submitted the interest rate, along with the balance sheet, profit and loss account and depreciation chart etc., on the validity of the tax. What was, which was considered by consensus before accepting the SC's offer for review. It was a leading action on some income taxes and at the same time the Assessment Notice issued under Section 66A of the Ordinance did not allege that the Contractor had committed a fraud or misleading department. However, upon entering into the agreement, the taxpayer accepted the offer of the SC due to income. There was no business investigating to diagnose the error and the fraudulent diagnosis, the proposed proceedings for his interest were completely suspended as the High Court accepted the constitutional request and announced the issuance of anonymous notice with no jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer