RAFIQ AHMED SANAURI versus UNION BANK LIMITED
The Banking Court has directed the decision-maker to file objections to the sale in execution of Sections 18 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 114, O XXI, R 90 and O XLVII, R 1 Rules. 20 ????? Submit in terms of sale price. AXXI, R 90, CPC's debtor demanded an extension of time, which was granted to the judge's creditor, rather than submitting an application on an extension date to review earlier orders, which the Banking Court Was rejected. It is not required to submit such an order nor to order extension. The lender of the judge who applied for the extension of time accepted the court order to deposit the money, thus preventing him from filing a revision application against such order, the review was very limited. Is, the judgment failed to prove any error in view of the lender's record, or the nature of the earlier guarantor's error on the order was dismissed by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Pasroor lawyer
