Find a Lawyer

IZHAR-UL-HAQ versus MST. SHAMEEM

Section 5 and Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition filed a fresh case for the recovery of articles related to Justice Dowry, which was deemed valid. The constitutional petition claimed that the woman had filed a lawsuit to dissolve the marriage, where cases related to dowry restitution allowance and misuse were made and judgment was taken against her. And the marriage was also dissolved in the matter of maintenance allowance and dowry articles, therefore, the present court was disqualified under the principles of justice and failed to prove its case in the first case of divorce. The Family Court's verdict on misusing dowry articles cannot be considered a judicial proceeding because the previous case was a suit for dissolution of marriage and in case of dissolution of marriage on the basis of marriage, the recovery of articles on dowry. Or a rehabilitation allowance, which was the exclusive right of the marital spouse. Gold can be the only benefits a woman receives and claims for her - she was obligated to return the restitution allowance was a free right that a party in relation to the marriage received due to the marriage and the trial. Was on different legal grounds and so on. The case of the trial court's dowry verdict that the woman had openly offered her right to the dowry articles - she was legally wrong and faced legal weakness and based on the identification of the case. Don't sue the woman / plaintiff for dissolving the marriage case famous high court advocate from Phool nagar lawyer