ABDUR RAZZAQ versus SHAH NAWAZ
Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 420/467/468/471 bail, the termination of the accused, which was specifically designated as a special role of depriving the complainant of huge sums, Was found guilty during the investigation. The accused did not come under the prohibited clause of section 497, CRPC, the accused could not claim bail as a matter of fact, especially since the accused was already involved in two other cases, in the aforementioned cases of the accused's statement. One of them was acquitted. It was the impression of the complainant that the trial court had resolved the complaint of the complainant, on the same basis, the request for bail was rejected before the accused's arrest and after a few weeks the accused's arrest had no new basis for grant. The accused was not entitled to a bail waiver and the trial court did not exercise its authority in granting bail to the accused. The order to grant the bail was withdrawn. , Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kharan lawyer
