Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ MUHAMMAD NASEEM (MUHAMMAD WASEEM ALIAS NASEEM) versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) / 392/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997) Section 7 (i) (a) (ii) Definition of FIR Definition and consultation regarding the occurrence of the case was dismissed on the basis that the case was dismissed. On the basis of the factual facts of the FIR was quick and straightforward, the people were suffering from fear, wealth and intimidation because of the terrorist activities of the police. The policemen presented evidence of their competence as they were armed terrorists. Were stopping the people who were trying. After killing many innocent people, their best effort was to improve their escape that spot arrest of accused with weapons and other articles provided solid evidence of their guilt. The trial of his crime was registered on an authentic basis and the story was factual, natural and trustworthy. The accused was sent by the police to the office of the accused, affecting the weapons protected by the police and evacuated. , After which a positive report was presented, the prosecution witnesses described the incident at length. Whether such witnesses made permanent statements in relation to the time and place of the incident and confirmed each other's statements on all material facts of the case, the prosecution's witnesses had no complaints. , Misconduct against or against the accused and they stated a material fact honestly, clearly and accurately, some of the errors in the statements of the smallest contradictions or witnesses are not sufficient to dispel their concrete testimony. Can occur, especially when the occasion is naturally charged. Against human beings to avoid arrest top civil advocates from Head Marala lawyer