Find a Lawyer

MRS. AMATUL JALIL KHAWAJA versus SYED IJAZ SHAH, HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 204 Court of Justice Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 3/4 of the Security of Pakistan Act (XXXV of 1952), Section 3 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance (XXXI of 1960), Section 3 contempt of court in the custody of three judges. The Federal Investigation Agency court officials were directed to prepare the three dents but were not presented on the basis that they were detained under section 3 of the Security of Pakistan Act 1952 against ideological detention and when While on bail, he was told that Dantes could not be released because there was another detention order against him. The petitioner filed a contempt of court action for non-issuance of the date in compliance with the order of the court officials. Under the Security of Pakistan Act 1952, the federal government (because it was a federal law) was detained for a period of three monks by the Government of Punjab's Home Department, Section 3 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960. The award was exercised under the exercise of powers, which was a provincial law record, indicating that the custody order was subsequently approved under section 3 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960. , Were properly served on dantes the same day. The allegation that the detention order was not ordered on detentions was denied by the official records, but with good faith, Bona withdrew the detention action. Or the conduct of the Authority cannot violate a court order, section 3 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960 immigration advocates email from Harnai lawyer