IRFAN MAQBOOL versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. DAULAT GATE, MULTAN
Section 10/11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Ending the process of constitutional plea The alleged abductor filed a simple marriage lawsuit against her husband, which was rejected by the Family Court, but the appeal was ruled because A constitutional petition was filed against him. The same was rejected by the High Court. The abducted needle court was entitled to a free will and consent to the marriage contract and if he had spoken with the accused, he was right. So, there was no crime by the constitutional petition filed by the accused to be revoked. After being subjected to a prolonged delay, re-sending the trial court to the petitioner under section 65K, CCPC, will not be in the interest of justice and the case is fit where Article 199 of the Constitution Use the HC option under Pakistan (1973) proved to be an abuse of law practice in order to stop the proceedings.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Bunner lawyer
