GHULAM RAZA versus GHULAM ASGHAR
Sections 6 and 13 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XVII, R3, closed the evidence of the plaintiff's trial evidence for the pre-trial right, and the close evidence of the plaintiff was overcome and resulted in the decision of the trial court and The lawsuit and appeal against the order were dismissed. The appellate court record also revealed that at certain dates of the hearing, there was evidence of the plaintiff, but on some dates of the hearing the record could not be recorded as the lawyer was not available for the defendant. Could not be recorded for the reason. In matters relating to the legality of the plaintiff, it was not merits in favor of judgment, but the High Court, together with the decisions and orders of the two courts, gave the plaintiff another last chance to present its evidence. After receiving the remand to make the same decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Chishtian lawyer
