Find a Lawyer

MST. MUMTAZ BEGUM versus ADDITIONAL CUSTODIAN OF ENEMY PROPERTY FOR PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Sections 6 (3) and 18 of Pakistan (Administration for Equity Property) Act (XII of 1957), Section 7 (3) of the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Section 3 (2) of the Defense Pakistan Rules, 1965, R-182 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitutional application Enemy property, order of annulment of allotment under restitution rules Additional password in favor of Animal Property Article holders In the interest of foreclosures by transfer and settlement authorities. Of the disputed properties transferred throughout, a permanent transfer order was issued and he submitted the property to the Punjab Cooperative Bank. The same and it was declared by the Supreme Court that the enemy property was kept in the possession of the enemy property, the residential portion of the disputed property was allotted by the Administrator of Animal Property in the interest of the applicants while the P application in the shops. The plaintiffs claimed that this property was irrevocable, which was transferred to their predecessor in interest on 1959 1959, and the value collected by the predecessor in the interest of the applicants was still issued by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner's Authority Certificate. Was present To this effect is attached to the request that no appeal was filed against the order of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner by any of the Institutions, dated 12 12 12 1959 despite the status of the petition for a long time no respondent. Nor was the written statement filed. To confirm applicant's claim, such order had to be approved by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner on 5 12 1959 as a final division of the transfer order or otherwise before the property was deposited. advocate from Utror lawyer