Find a Lawyer

MST. SURAYYA AZIZ versus COLLECTOR, LAHORE DISTRICT, LAHORE

Sections 4 and 17 (4) Privately Administered Schools and Colleges (Municipalities) Regulations, 1972 [MLR 118 of 1972] West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), Sections 13 and 15 Civil Procedure Code ( VV 1908), Section 11 law martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 4, 5, 23 and 24 Constitutionally the same applicant was hired as the owner of the property. Under which national status was adopted. The provisions of MLR 118 of 1972 filed with the Controller of Rent a withdrawal petition against the management of the school, which was accepted and retained by the High Court officials. The second appeal was dismissed and the government filed a constitutional petition because of this question, which was sought under the provisions of MLR 118 of 1972, therefore, the rent controller had no jurisdiction to look into the matter. Was not, and thus the withdrawal order was approved by the rent controller along with J. In the second appeal, the judgment of the Additional District Judge of the High Court was not sustainable in the eyes of the law. The petitioner also challenged the receipt of the order for the acquisition of the property, but the petition was dismissed, which led to the dismissal of the petitioner's file intra-court appeal without which there was no challenge. The decision passed in the second appeal in the eviction proceedings and the decision in the intra-court appeal was stayed on the basis of the principles of waiver, estoppel and race Judeta authority to begin proceedings under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Later action was started to acquire this land. The provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 criminal advocate from Sanghar lawyer