Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus CH. FAZAL ELAHI

OV, Rr 16 & 18 & O XXVII, Rr 1 to 4 summons issued to the appellant / government department seeking summons to the appellants, revealed that summons was not sought on the appellants, appellant's officer received What and the processor server report did not mention the name of the officer who was tried by the trial court to obtain service of the appellant affected by O XXVII, RR 1 to 4, CPC effect, under the service of the appellants. There was no deduction. Was not properly effected and O XXVII was a violation of the mandatory provisions of the CPC, without prior authorization inheritance advocates near Hala lawyer