GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE
Sections 3 and 14 of the Acquisition of Land (Housing) (Cancellation) Act of Punjab (XII of 1985), Section 3 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court Appeal Failure to pay acquisition of land pending pending Land Development Authority Had received The award was given under the Punjab Acquisition of Land (Housing) Act 1973, but there was a dispute between the parties regarding the ownership of the acquired land and compensation to the landlords in favor of the respondents to the Supreme Court Development Authority. Was not paid. The respondents of the litigation applied to the Commissioner to amend the award on the basis of a civil court order after the successor to the Supreme Court, and the award was amended and the respondents were entitled to compensation and the Appellants Award. Edit and prefer a constitutional application against an arbitrator / arbitrator. The dispute was set to settle. The arbitrator / arbitrator decided the matter in favor of the adjournment. The provisional and constitutional petition was dealt with by the forthcoming applicants, which did not apply to the arbitration proceedings. The ratification of the Act, 1973, even if on a case-by-case basis does not fall within the section 3 of the Punjab Acquisition Land (Housing) Act, 1985, to amend the award as per the Civil Order Commissioner's direction. The court was only a consequence of the order that the Lahore Development Authority was otherwise obliged to act in accordance with the Civil Court's decree of title, to try to reopen the dispute and to approve the decisions passed in civil litigation between the parties. Had to defeat. Inter
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer