Find a Lawyer

FAIZ AHMED versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 4/4 / evidence 34 Definition of Evidence The eight accused were named in the FIR and one of the accused, who according to the FIR was the cause of death of the accused, was convicted and three accused were convicted. The trial court had acquitted and appealed against it. Their success was dismissed on the basis of illegal prosecution. The accused, with his 7mm rifle, injured the victim's witness by selecting the most important part of his body. The prosecution's star proved to be a witness in the presence of the accused on the occasion, who was injured in the incident, fully supported the litigation case and his evidence was fully supported by medical evidence. There was no scope for any doubt about the crime, it was said that the accused's appeal was dismissed and his conviction and sentence were upheld by the High Court case. It was against the rest of the accused that they emphasized the role of being present at the airstrike that the co-accused was aerial shootings, but did not do so to cause any injury to any late or injured prosecution witness. In the event that there is no recovery by chance, the recovery of firearms, for example, stated that the accomplices would not proceed with the prosecution, adding that the accomplices were given the benefit of doubt and punishment and punishment. ? They were recorded by the trial court, set aside and ordered to be released. immigration advocates contact from Padidan lawyer