Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus SESSIONS JUDGE, ATTOCK

Section 544 An Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), the trial court convicted the offender of the payment of compensation to the victim 324 and sentenced him to four years imprisonment. 000 has already been passed for six months with instruction to pay compensation. Section I appellate court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused through trial court, but reduced the compensation amount from Rs. 100,000 to Rs. 50 , 000, the High Court upheld the decision of the appellate court and observed that since the accused had served his entire sentence, he should be released to the Victim, which should be sent to the appellate court. Low compensation was not paid and the court gave was maintained, the trial for the payment application was filed before the magistrate who had been removed, but the appellate court to review the authorization. The accused's confession was that he had suffered a substantial sentence, and because he was ordered to be released, the effect was that he was free from his responsibility. The confession of the accused for payment of compensation was suspended because the payment of compensation under section 44AAA (compensation) would be in addition to any punishment which the court may pay, which the victim may be instructed to pay by the accused, Regardless of the sentence related to the punishment of the accused, it was imposed by the High Court only reduced the sentence to the person already passing through the accused, but the compensation paid by the accused was in addition to any punishment and was payable. The accused would have to pay compensation and a similar recovery would have to be made. Land Revenue Balances us immigration advocates from Quetta lawyer