Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) of the evidence appreciation FIR in which the accused was named was immediately listed and no delay was made at the beginning of the investigation, both of the prosecution's witnesses at their place of incident Presence was sufficiently defined and cannot be considered a witness to the occasion. He said the prosecution's witnesses with the victim had no room to refute their testimony because they were interested, but there was no rivalry against the accuser of false opportunities or alternatives, except the real culprit. Was. Both the prosecution witnesses said the accused fired indiscriminately at the beating of the deceased and that fact was confirmed by medical evidence along with medical report from the spot and the tea spoon stained from the spot where the alleged incident took place. Whether the person who set the scene of the incident as alleged by the prosecution and was not contradicted by the defense aspect was the same accused, both the prosecution's witnesses proved to be true and faith-bearing witnesses. And there is no reason to deny their testimony, the identity of the accused was neither controversial nor There was no reason for any instability or absence of continuity was not known in the prosecution case, both witnesses stated that the accused had quarreled with the deceased on payment of premises rent. Some of the freelancers who gathered at the site did not check through the investigation. An officer who had no basis for denying witnesses because it is common practice in society that irresponsible people fear their lives. solicitors from Bhakkar lawyer