Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMED SHAIKH versus MESSRS K.E.S.C. LIMITED

Section 2 (b) employees were dismissed from employment for unlawfully agreeing to issue a notice to the employees and after a charge sheet, but without proper investigation on the report of the inquiry committee, the inquiry committee Had submitted its report before issuing a showcase notice and charge sheet to the Government Employees Inquiry Committee, although statements of public servants were recorded, but no witnesses were examined in their presence nor did they testify. The opportunity to investigate was provided, in these circumstances, by the inquiry, not by the committee Was there. According to the provisions of the law, the order to remove government employees was approved with the former effect as it was likewise passed on 133 2000 but made effective from 16 8 1999, during which time some government employees were given the former effect. Could not be approved, they were advertised and received such promotion benefits. Such an order also discriminated against the employees of the CV expressly violating because four employees in connection with the same transaction. Was apologized and restored to his job after a fresh investigation against him was found official. The main court's appeal was dismissed by the order of the Speaker, and he was awarded the highest sentence of removal from the job for no good reason, without following the principles of natural justice; such an order was directed to the authorities. Restore them to the same position that they were removed from the job with all the benefits, provided that government employees file affidavits with solid evidence immigration advocates phone number from Vehari lawyer