Find a Lawyer

SHAHID MAHMOOD NADEEM versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (iv), Rules of Service of Employees 6 and 7, 13, 16 and 14 07 Service Tribunals Act (1973) LXX), the first charge against a public servant terminating the service in connection with Section 4 corruption was that he made false statements, verbally and in writing, against the employer corporation, and in his interview, the corporation's image and performance. Was tainted. Employees at home and abroad responded, saying their statements and comments were justified in the charge sheet. Impact Law Employees were not only banned from making negative comments against their employer through service rules, but with ethical principles and good governance, the employee was not required to make derogatory acts. Statements against his department from where he was earning his bread and butter must have damaged the image of the employer's firm when comments made on his financial and other affairs of the company were made by his MQM. The Ply Employee participated in the inquiry proceedings against the Inquiry Officer. Under these circumstances, no illegal or irregular conduct was committed when it was found that the public servant had absolutely no authority and justification for making the comments attributed to him on the charge sheet without leaving the public servant. He was charged with misconduct in his minor absence and was not presented in the charge sheet, nor was the other inquiry officer involved in the inquiry by the employer corporation under which The services of the civil servants were terminated against him tax advocates from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer