ASLAM PERVAIZ SOOMRO versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTIONS, ISLAMABAD
Serving as a Junior Officer on the Return of Service due to absenteeism from Section 4 Rule 3, 4 and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Giving the job where they continue to serve and their monthly contributions / salaries etc were regularly sent to the parent department that after the completion of the three year deputation period, the department borrowed The order was approved, but the order to withdraw / withdraw shortly after it was withdrawn The department and the government employee were relieved due to their retirement. Due to the withdrawal of fear, the department continued to serve as a creditor, after termination of his term of three years, his services were terminated without any notice and without making any inquiry front. Depending on the absence of a public employee, despite being a fly in the department department, it was in the knowledge of the parent department to receive monthly contributions during the extension period by borrowing the department, but the order to withdraw the return order was issued. Was not aware of this because it was not applied to the parent department even if notified by order of deportation. Borrowing the parent department to the department, the public servant was obliged to inform the parent department about it, and the parent department also had a duty to inquire about the civil servant when he did not join the parent department. When the parents acted extraordinarily quickly to terminate the services of the department. Government employee issues notice without cause
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
