MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE
Section 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) Proof of Appreciation The prosecution's case against a convicted defendant is confirmed by the complainant and the prosecutor's witness, who made permanent statements before the trial court, before the accused being guilty. The statements of the defendant were substantially corroborated by this purpose. The medical evidence received considerable support, in which case, it was sufficiently justified not to challenge his conviction, as the trial court found it correct. The accused was just praying for the reduction of sentence by trial and the parties were immediate neighbors to each other until the present case. , There was no background of ill-will or bitterness among the parties and they enjoyed good and happy friendly relations with each other even according to the FIR itself without trial in the case of the accused. Suddenly there has been a breakdown .And there was no cold-blooded murder after the plan and the court, using its discretion, reduced the death sentence by the trial court to life imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Manoabad lawyer