Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus NOOR KHAN

The suit for Section 8 Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Section 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 47 suit was filed on the basis of the judgment of the suit and in favor of the order, in their favor The trial was earlier passed in the plaintiff's case. Previously the plaintiffs had accumulated the sale price that the defendant had received, but since the order was not filed by the plaintiff, the plaintiff did not grant the plaintiffs possession of the suit property. , The plaintiff claimed that the plaintiff had not filed an execution. The order request for the first authorization within the stipulated time, was not a satisfactory valid justification of section 47 filed by the defendants; the CPC did not prohibit taking advantage of this remedy, but only the forum. Was enacted to enforce rights so that all matters relating to enforcement could be enforced. , The discharge or satisfaction of the discharge by the implementing court was not implemented to the satisfaction of the present order. Matter, but the terms of the decree were complied with by the plaintiffs / regulators, in which a decree was passed in favor of the defendants not approved by the court, although the detained plaintiff still proceeded. Did not enter into possession, they became the owners of the suit property when the judgment and order was passed in their favor and the defendants / decision-makers were left to own the suit property when the plaintiffs filed for a period of twelve years. Granted, they could not be justified simply because they were exempted from Section 8 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 advocate for immigration from Dir lawyer