Find a Lawyer

RAJA SAHADAT NAWAZ versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION), RAWALPINDI

Article 202020/8 468/111 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The termination of the FIR allegation against the accused was that he had tampered with the chassis and engine numbers of the vehicle in which the suspect was allegedly driving the car. The limit was the buyer. Duty was paid and the documents contained the same engine, model and chassis number as were entered in the registration certificate and were unable to rely on the FIRC report of the Franzic Science Laboratory because similarly indented, tactics were imposed. And was developed in conjunction with the respondents. The collusion of the laboratory officials and the story of the prosecution was denied by their own records, the documents produced by the defendants established their ownership of the undercover vehicle and the defendants committed their criminal offenses under Sections 420, 468 and 471. Failed to verify, the PPC was not constituted against the accused, nor did the prosecutor have any evidence to include it in the same number. A complaint or lawsuit was ever filed in relation to a vehicle in a dispute that was seized under the CR PC, which the FIR S the FIR by police was sufficient to promote education. The cases against the accused were dismissed immigration advocates contact from Kallur Kot lawyer