NASIM AHMAD versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Section 17 (1A) (a) Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, R6 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Retirement Appeal to Service without Compulsory Retirement Mandatory And the appeal tribunal was dismissed. The competent authority has abused its powers because it did not issue a show cause notice nor assign a reason, nor did it give any civil servant an appropriate opportunity to be heard. Keeping employees away from their legal wishes and wishes Without fulfilling the necessary legal formalities, the public servant was charged with certain affidavits, along with an affidavit, which the Tribunal Service Tribunal is capable of examining whether section 17 ( 1 A) or not. ) Was wrong with this act or illegal order the Supreme Court accepted the appeal, set aside the retirement order and dismissed the decision and immediately restored the government employees with the observation with all the benefit that the authorized authority freely The measures may be followed, if deemed appropriate and appropriate, subject to all legal exceptions. And strictly in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
