JALAL KHAN versus KHANDOO MALIK
A. XXVI, R 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Local Commission, Appointment of Applicant's Principal Complaint was that the Appellate Court and the High Court did not appoint the Local Commission to ascertain the correct facts. That caused discrimination. The validity of their case was rejected by the two courts on the appointment of a local commission because there was enough evidence on record to decide the case as the applicants could not demand the appointment of a local commission for their convenience as they could not produce any credible evidence. The evidence could not prove their request. The appellate court did not indicate any misreading or reading of evidence. The High Court rightly refused to interfere with the conclusions of the facts that the following courts denied the leave of appeal. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Noorpur nooranga lawyer
