Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Section 2A [as incorporated by the Service Tribunals (Amendment) Act (XVII of 1997)] and Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) removes the applicant from service and was a cashier. The commission was dismissed by the award service tribunal. Applicant appeals for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that he was an employee or a civil servant. The Weldetty Tribunal misrepresented and misinterpreted the Services' Section 2A con Tribunals Act, 1973. Such employees were eligible for jurisdiction of the tribunal as being civil servants. , To the extent they were awarded due to Section 2A of the Act for a limited purpose, that is, to the Tribunal for redressal of its complaints regarding the service rules and regulations applicable to their affairs, regardless of service rules. Referring to the fact that the services to serve as cashier of the applicant. The Wage Commission was regular through the award or otherwise the appeal to the Supreme Court would be accepted and the matter remanded to the Tribunal. The fresh impact of this decision, after giving all concerned the opportunity to be heard divorce advocates from Ghotki lawyer