Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus MUKHTIAR AHMED

Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2, suits for declaration and permanent injunction, claiming that the plaintiff applied for the suit. The property is owned by the defendant and no certificate was obtained. Concerns came from the same plaintiff that a permanent injunction against the defendant was sought, which was heard by the plaintiff, which was accepted by the trial court, but the appellant of the appellate court as the plaintiff. The plaintiff was included and included as a plaintiff. By filing an injunction against the plaintiff, the plaintiff received a withdrawal order which had finalized the order because the defendant had no prior knowledge of the plaintiff's position as a tenant tenant. The challenger could not challenge the claimant before he was not challenged after surrendering. In order to approve the interim injunction petition, hardly any aspect of the case can be considered as the right filed by the plaintiff but was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. Was not guaranteed list of supreme court advocates from Rajana lawyer