Find a Lawyer

AHMAD DIN versus SHAMA BIBI

Article 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovery of articles of dowry by a woman in whose house she and her husband lived shortly after their marriage against which the lawsuit was filed (Applicant) It is stated that he had only arranged their marriage and later after the relationship with his wife was strained, he went to his parents' house and took away the cow petitioner's articles as well. It was claimed that the two lower courts acted illegally, which was ignored. The fact of the matter is that the applicant had nothing to do with the spouse except that he had spent a lot of money out of his pocket and arranged for their marriage and said that in this case the two courts below The results provided by SK have hardly received any sanity that is needed. It should be reversed that the evidence of the accused woman's testimony was ambiguous, it faced contradictions and lacked the necessary supporting evidence. In light of the evidence, the full state of the situation and the background of the case, the inevitable conclusion was that it was devised by the spouse to undermine their relationship and suppress the applicant. Was. Although she was an essential party in the context and specific background and no effective commitment could be brought in her absence, her suit could be dismissed only to end the case. But while resolving disputes between the High Court parties, invalid judgments and decrees of lower courts enjoying constitutional petitions ask a advocate free from Jamrud Road lawyer