Find a Lawyer

SHARIF HUSSAIN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE

Section 25A Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 of a Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (1) (B), Third Proviso Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Employee Federal The applicant was the Goods Clerk in the Pakistan Railways and his services were dismissed under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. In 1969, the Labor Court accepted it and he was appointed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal only. Rejected and ordered restored to service. On the basis that after entering Section 2A in the Service Tribunals Act 1973, the service tribunal provided by the applicant was available to the plaintiff that he was an employee and, as an employee in the federal government, Was not included in the provisions of section 2A. The legality of the Act, 1973 was the only federal government employees who could refer to the Service Tribunal, who were not excluded from the definition of \ public servant of. Under section 2 (1) (b) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, the applicant is named a "worker" by the Labor Court and such a matter has been upset by the Labor Appellate Tribunal, the applicant is excluded from the definition of a public servant. Was. As stated in section 2 (1) (b) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, the Pakistan Railways is a department of the Federal Government and such employees do not hold positions in relation to the affairs of the Federation. This is not an authority; the corporation; the body or organization could not contact the applicant service tribunal within the meaning of section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, and the Labor Appellate Tribunal did not comply with the provisions of section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. immigration advocate from Lower Dir lawyer