AGHA M. IKRAM KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
The Arts 199 and 25 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2, a constitutional applicant who was retired general manager of the National Fertilizer Corporation, treated federal and provincial government employees for relief in payment of property taxes. Prayed The waiver of a Federal or Provincial Levy Reviewer by withdrawing the provisions of Article 25 of the Constitution, as per constitutional jurisdiction, was the privilege of the relevant Government High Court, neither the Federal nor Provincial Government required to adopt any particular policy. May be. The applicant's claim was not a force to be reckoned with because the employer corporation is a body corporate that could be injured at any time and its legal status was no different from any government company limited by shares. Can't be talked about With government employees employed by the federal or provincial government, the fact that railway employees were on board, does not in itself mean that they were not in the service of the federal government, provided for Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 There were specific and related issues that could be taken to the service tribunal, he said, adding that the provision of the law would not make those types. Employees become government employees for other purposes
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Mir Ali lawyer