Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus SESSIONS JUDGE, KASUR

Appeal for seeking summons of section 265F (2), 439 and 540 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 witnesses, petitioned by complainant under Section 265F (2), CCPC filed two Claimed to have persons as prosecution witnesses who claimed to be witnesses of the claim. The case was rejected by the trial court on the ground that neither the names of the people were registered in the FIR nor in the police court under Section 265F (2), the complainant filed two supplementary statements. Had gone, the CRPC had to be separated from it. The Public Prosecutor, the names of all persons who will likely be aware of the facts of the prosecution case as presented by the police challan court under Section 540, investigate CRPC under the Code of Criminal Procedure, At any stage of the trial or any proceeding, there was the option of being summoned, no one examines as a witness or any person's attendance, even though the person has not been summoned or re-examined. It has been summoned, if the evidence of such persons was found to be necessary for a fair decision in this case, in the present case, even if it The names of those who were called as eyewitnesses were not named, but the complainant's conduct proved that they were witnesses to the incident and that they could not be present. ? Due to political influence, the trial is still under investigation, the complainant appeared as the prosecutor's witness and it is reported that he was told by two persons that the accused committed the murder of the complainant's son. What is, in this case registration advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer