Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAHMAN versus THE STATE

Sections 10 (3) (4) and 6 (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the value of section 7 evidence was that the affected girl's age was 15/16 years and there was an unmarried commission of adultery, with the affected His statement was confirmed by the Chemical Examiner's report and there was no reason for the accused to make false allegations. Medical evidence confirmed the statement of the victim, which contained drug-related stains and the suspect. There was no valid reason for the victim's sincere statement. The confidence needed to establish a record of punishment on the accused was sufficient; the prosecutor, without any doubt, proved his case against the accused. When he was examined, there was no sign of torture on the victim. Meet. She arrived at her own home and was not reported to the police in connection with her father's abduction. Money was not sent to the serologist for grouping / comparison, possibly, it cannot be ruled out that the alleged victim agreed with an accused before the party and his case was registered. Was charged. Under Section 10 (4) of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Hoodood) Ordinance 1979, punishment was not legal and appropriate and was changed accordingly. Section 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and the defendants were each sentenced to 10 years RI. advocate from Samundri lawyer