Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus MST. SARDAR BEGUM

Section 8 The plaintiff allegedly sued the defendant who purchased a piece of land under a registered sale deed and the case was filed through an amendment of the Revenue Record for possession. Committed a crime and illegally occupied part of the said land for trial of the plaintiff by the trial court, and the appellate court ruled that it was justified that the variation be in favor of the plaintiff. I do not, and the mutation was not approved according to the registered sale deadline. The stage and the local commissioner's report, which was allegedly patwari, was not considered by the appellate court. It was approved in accordance with the registered sale deed and from the beginning the back tatima was initially prepared on its back and the local commissioner. The report was prepared without detection. A permanent point (strongly interval q) was made on the basis of photocopies of some fragments of any mosaic / or \ tiger rah parchy consulting but almost j jar rah parchment with few pieces and ultimately no definite finding was made. Under which the concurrent conclusions of the courts were not only evidence-based, but they were not interfered with by reasonable and plausible reasoning. By the High Court best law firms from Ghotki lawyer