Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, LAHORE

Arts 199 and 212 (2) constitutional application, maintenance of applicants who were employed by electric supply companies were essentially retired / dismissed / excluded from service. Vidity seed companies were limited by shares, companies' ordinances, Were registered under 1984 and were not a legal corporation. And the federal government was not part of the companies as mere trade organizations, in which case the law of the master and servant was fully attracted, according to the authorities, two companies which passed the order against the applicants. , Were not public functionaries, could not be challenged by the applicants under Article 199 of the Constitution's petition, it may be said that the companies may have their alleged illegal compulsory retirement, termination of employment, removal of employment or change of post. Approved orders against applicants for damages And also can not challenge. The tribunal said because the orders were approved by the authorities, a public limited company that was not even a legal organization could not be challenged in front of the service tribunal because its orders had to be approved by a competent authority before the service tribunal. Which could have been the jurisdiction of the constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution. Due to the bar contained in Article 212 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the applicants are also not available. famous high court advocate from Doltala lawyer