Find a Lawyer

ARIF MUHAMMAD QAZI versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Section 2 (1) (a) and 23 Government Employees (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1973, Part III of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the Adhoc Appointment Adhoc Appointment According to the formula formulated by the Government, the ad hoc appointments are classified. To streamline the service of: First, through the advertisement and quota observations recruited after inviting applications for the appointment of eligible persons. And secondly, the lack of required eligibility without quota restrictions and invitations to request applications through advertising was required to be forwarded to the Public Service Commission for confirmation, while those in the second category were appointed. There was a need to compete with fresh candidates before the commission. The lack of a valid permanent qualification or required qualification for selection is the specific difference in question at ad hoc appointments, which is acknowledged by the ad hoc practice and is subject to quotas or requests for solicitation by advertising. was not. Appointments will be made by the Authority and in the event of any defect by them, authentic appointments will not suffer due to the fact that the Commission was being sent for consideration of their matters, such status. The government itself did not file a complaint on the ban. In spite of such appointments, the final decision shall be with the Commission's High Court, which rejects the constitutional applications for the failure of the category appointments to direct the Commission to send the cases before the Commission. Will do On this, and in the event of any difficulty, the matter under section 23 of the Civil Servants Act 1973 list of advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer