Find a Lawyer

MST. MUAZAMA BATOOL versus DISTRICT JUDGE, D.G. KHAN

Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Muslim Marriages Act (VII of 1939), Article 2 The dissolution of marriage on the basis of Khula Khula's idea / appeal, suit against dissolution of marriage filed by wife against husband The eligibility decision was passed by the Family Court. The foundation of the kula and the idea of kula was the house that the husband bought in the name of the wife because her Dover Family Court believed that the husband would be considered the owner of the said house and the decree passed by the Family Court. Was suspended. By appeal through the wife, but her appeal was dismissed on the ground that it was not upheld The appeal was not available in the decree of termination of the marriage except as provided in Section 2 of item number (viii). LD. The dissolution of the Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, but the present case of wife and wife did not come to the family court in the said category, under which the husband was given the house in consideration of his daughter-in-law. It was also considered a Khloe and to that extent the Family Court order would fall within the parameters of section 14 (1) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, which provided an appeal against the judgment and injunction. The Family Court's order to dissolve the marriage was not challenged by the appeal in the present case, but it was only the case that was apprehended by the appellate case, in the circumstances of section 14 (2) (a) of the West Pakistan family. ). The Courts Act, 1964, was the right of the Dover wife and she could claim that if she was not paid or not paid in a separate suit, and if such a case was dismissed or dismissed for Dover's recovery, This Q how to become a advocate from Haroonabad lawyer