SAIN GUL WALI KHAN versus THE STATE
Articles 302/457/382/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 164 Law Procedure (10 of 1984), Article 39 Defining evidence to prove a criminal conviction by the accused while on trial in a police custody For such a conviction, the court relied on the conviction of the magistrate, who also appeared as a prosecutor's witness, satisfying the requirements of the law in recording the confessional statements of the accused persons, it was alleged. No such evidence has been brought to the record under which it can be admitted that the confessional statements were the result of any conclusions illegal, The fact that the accused was in police custody before committing the crime would not result in the confession that the confession was a crime tutor and that the trial court, in the circumstances, did not, in the right way, result in repression or police violence. Was dependent on Confessional statements and conviction to the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Bannu lawyer