Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus SALAH-UD-DIN

The claimant of the Section 42 lawsuit claimed that he was the sole legal heir as the deceased's son and that he was fully entitled to inherit property left by the deceased and that the two women present in the interests of the deceased. Had no daughters and had no property property. The plaintiff's father was on the Ounce Plaintiffs to prove that the defendant had two women / forefathers not his father's daughters in the interest of the defendant. Submitted that the trial court of the fathers of the daughters of the deceased female defendants dismissed the case based on the documentary evidence presented by the defendants, but the appellate court upheld the trial court's decision. In rejecting, the oral evidence presented by the litigation is not only denied by the defendants. But the defendants also presented the authentic and convincing documentary evidence of oral defendants, and their testimony was not sufficient to refute the documentary evidence presented by the 4 evidence to prove that the two women were deceased. As the Daughters 'daughters, the appellate court preferred oral evidence against the documentary evidence, which was also supported by oral statements, the appellate court's verdict of defendants' testimony was based on evidence and record based on speculation. Was not sustained in the eyes of the law which the High Court on the one hand And the trial court was reinstated top advocate from Rangoo lawyer