Find a Lawyer

SALIM SADIQ versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

RR 5, 6, 7A & 7C Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 4, 5 (2) and 212 Constitutional Petitions challenged non-compliance of rules and non-interference of public officials. What was alleged and that the authorities failed to comply with the rules and regulations, as a civil servant and his case was linked to the terms and conditions of service, could not maintain the constitutional petition, the terms of service In relation to the rules, the arbitration phase was not upheld by the Constitution. Public officials were on duty to act in accordance with the law under Article 4 of the Constitution. And a binding social contract between. The Legislature and the Judiciary which order that under Article 5 (2) of the forthcoming Constitution of Pakistan, each such level shall comply with the Constitution's order. Even the chief executive of the country was not above the Constitution. Article 212 of the Constitution exists, despite the fact that the disputes of their subsidiaries should be resolved within a reasonable time and due to the inaccessibility of public officials, Article 212 of the Constitution exists, directing the High Court to the public jurisdiction Had sufficient jurisdiction to act accordingly. With the law under its Articles 4 and 199 top advocate from Moro lawyer